Abstract
New Urbanist development is often characterized by higher densities, mixed land uses and various transportation options – characteristics often evidenced by older, pre-automobile neighborhoods. This is no accident; New Urbanism aims to closely approximate many qualities of ‘old urbanist’ neighborhoods to support, among other things, increased transportation options beyond the automobile. However, existing research is mixed as to whether new urbanist developments are reaching their transportation goals. This study employs multiple methods to examine the degree to which travel behavior in New Urbanist neighborhoods is comparable to that of old urbanist neighborhoods in the same region. Mode choice models show distance to work as a significant predictor of walking and cycling, while availability of free parking at work significantly predicts driving. Despite the fact that the New Urbanist neighborhoods are further from the central business district (CBD) than the old urbanist neighborhoods, average distance to work is similar across all neighborhoods – suggesting that employment locations are decentralized. We conclude that while New Urbanist communities may not currently be reaching their transportation goals, they have the ability to provide a supportive context for parking policy reforms and transit investments that disincentive auto travel and prioritize walking, cycling and transit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
2010 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimate. (2010) Commuting characteristics by sex, Denver, Colorado. Prepared by the US Census Bureau. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_10_1YR_S0801&prodType=table, accessed June 2012.
Calthorpe, P. (1993) The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D 2 (3): 199–219.
Cervero, R. and Gorham, R. (1995) Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (2): 210–225.
Cervero, R. and Radisch, C. (1996) Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3 (3): 127–141.
Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2010) Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (3): 265–294.
Falconer, R., Newman, P. and Giles-Corti, B. (2010) Is practice aligned with the principles? Implementing New Urbanism in Perth, Western Australia. Transport Policy 17 (5): 287–294.
Gallimore, J.M., Brown, B.B. and Werner, C.M. (2011) Walking routes to school in New Urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (2): 184–191.
Greenwald, M.J. (2003) The road less traveled: New Urbanist inducements to travel mode substitution for nonwork trips. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (1): 39–57.
Handy, S. and Clifton, K.J. (2001) Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 28 (4): 317–346.
Heinen, E., Maat, K. and Wee, B.V. (2011) The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16 (2): 102–109.
Heinen, E., van Wee, B. and Maat, K. (2010) Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews 30 (1): 59–96.
Khattak, A. and Rodriguez, D. (2005) Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (2005): 481–500.
Krizek, K., Forsyth, A. and Baum, L. (2009) Walking and Cycling International Literature Review, http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/files/267/Walking-and-cycling-international-literature-review.pdf.
Lovejoy, K., Handy, S. and Mokhtarian, P. (2010) Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (1): 37–48.
Moudon, A.V. et al (2005) Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10 (3): 245–261.
Moutinho, L. and Hutcheson, G. (2011) Multinomial Logistic Regression, The SAGE Dictionary of Quantitative Management Research. SAGE Publications, pp. 208–212.
Pucher, J., Dill, J. and Handy, S. (2010) Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine 50 (2010): S106–S125.
Rodríguez, D., Evenson, K.R. and Khattak, A.J. (2006) Can New Urbanism encourage physical activity?: Comparing a New Urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs. Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (1): 43–54.
Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F. and Frank, L.D. (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine : A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 25 (2): 80–91.
Winters, M., Brauer, M., Setton, E.M. and Teschke, K. (2010) Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 87 (6): 969–993.
Xing, Y., Handy, S.L. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2010) Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15 (2): 73–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piatkowski, D., Marshall, W. ‘New’ versus ‘Old’ Urbanism: A comparative analysis of travel behavior in large-scale New Urbanist communities and older, more established neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado. Urban Des Int 19, 228–245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.30
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.30