Skip to main content
Log in

‘New’ versus ‘Old’ Urbanism: A comparative analysis of travel behavior in large-scale New Urbanist communities and older, more established neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New Urbanist development is often characterized by higher densities, mixed land uses and various transportation options – characteristics often evidenced by older, pre-automobile neighborhoods. This is no accident; New Urbanism aims to closely approximate many qualities of ‘old urbanist’ neighborhoods to support, among other things, increased transportation options beyond the automobile. However, existing research is mixed as to whether new urbanist developments are reaching their transportation goals. This study employs multiple methods to examine the degree to which travel behavior in New Urbanist neighborhoods is comparable to that of old urbanist neighborhoods in the same region. Mode choice models show distance to work as a significant predictor of walking and cycling, while availability of free parking at work significantly predicts driving. Despite the fact that the New Urbanist neighborhoods are further from the central business district (CBD) than the old urbanist neighborhoods, average distance to work is similar across all neighborhoods – suggesting that employment locations are decentralized. We conclude that while New Urbanist communities may not currently be reaching their transportation goals, they have the ability to provide a supportive context for parking policy reforms and transit investments that disincentive auto travel and prioritize walking, cycling and transit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimate. (2010) Commuting characteristics by sex, Denver, Colorado. Prepared by the US Census Bureau. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_10_1YR_S0801&prodType=table, accessed June 2012.

  • Calthorpe, P. (1993) The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D 2 (3): 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. and Gorham, R. (1995) Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (2): 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. and Radisch, C. (1996) Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3 (3): 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2010) Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (3): 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, R., Newman, P. and Giles-Corti, B. (2010) Is practice aligned with the principles? Implementing New Urbanism in Perth, Western Australia. Transport Policy 17 (5): 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallimore, J.M., Brown, B.B. and Werner, C.M. (2011) Walking routes to school in New Urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (2): 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, M.J. (2003) The road less traveled: New Urbanist inducements to travel mode substitution for nonwork trips. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (1): 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. and Clifton, K.J. (2001) Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 28 (4): 317–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E., Maat, K. and Wee, B.V. (2011) The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16 (2): 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, E., van Wee, B. and Maat, K. (2010) Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews 30 (1): 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak, A. and Rodriguez, D. (2005) Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (2005): 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizek, K., Forsyth, A. and Baum, L. (2009) Walking and Cycling International Literature Review, http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/files/267/Walking-and-cycling-international-literature-review.pdf.

  • Lovejoy, K., Handy, S. and Mokhtarian, P. (2010) Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (1): 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A.V. et al (2005) Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10 (3): 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho, L. and Hutcheson, G. (2011) Multinomial Logistic Regression, The SAGE Dictionary of Quantitative Management Research. SAGE Publications, pp. 208–212.

  • Pucher, J., Dill, J. and Handy, S. (2010) Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine 50 (2010): S106–S125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, D., Evenson, K.R. and Khattak, A.J. (2006) Can New Urbanism encourage physical activity?: Comparing a New Urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs. Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F. and Frank, L.D. (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine : A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 25 (2): 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, M., Brauer, M., Setton, E.M. and Teschke, K. (2010) Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 87 (6): 969–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, Y., Handy, S.L. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2010) Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15 (2): 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Piatkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piatkowski, D., Marshall, W. ‘New’ versus ‘Old’ Urbanism: A comparative analysis of travel behavior in large-scale New Urbanist communities and older, more established neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado. Urban Des Int 19, 228–245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.30

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.30

Keywords

Navigation