Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of livable streets in Malaysia: A study of physical attributes of two streets in Kuala Lumpur

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban Planners have stressed the important role of street physical attributes for enhancing livability and activity in the area. The purpose of this study is to identify physical attributes of streetscapes that influence street livability. Previous studies focused mainly on traffic management as a major determinant of street livability. Studies that address people’s perception of street physical attributes as influencing street livability tend to separate. This study is an empirical examination of people’s perception of the physical attributes of Kuala Lumpur streetscapes. Structured observations and a questionnaire survey were used to identify determinants of street livability in two multi-functional streets located in the inner part of Kuala Lumpur. On the basis of literature review and observation of the studied areas, 14 physical attributes of street were identified and evaluated. Findings show that provision of facilities like paving, maintenance, parking space and traffic calming techniques contribute to street livability in Kuala Lumpur streetscapes. Indeed, the result of this study is recommended to Malaysian practitioners and policymakers. This result indicates the most significant factors that need to pay attention to meet human needs in designing livable spaces in Kuala Lumpur City Center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleyard, D. (1981) Livable Streets. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. and Lintell, M. (1972) The environmental quality of city streets: The residents’ viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 38 (2): 84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S. and Smith, G. (1985) Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designer. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, M. (2012) Radical streets? The impact of innovative street designs on liveability and activity in residential areas. Urban Design International 17 (3): 178–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann, P., Macdonald, E. and Kronemeyer, T. (1999) Livable streets revisited. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (2): 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. and Stone, A. (1992) Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherulnik, P. D. (1993) Applications of Environment-behavior Research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, S.J. and Steed, L. (2007) SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish: Version 14.0 for Windows. Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. United States of America: SAGE Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1990) City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D.A. (2002) Surveys in Social Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, D. (2001) Social Research Methods. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E. and Speck, J. (2000) Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumbaugh, E. and Gattis, J. (2005) Safe streets, livable streets. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (3): 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., Hearst, M., Oakes, J.M. and Schmitz, K.H. (2008) Design and destinations: Factors influencing walking and total physical activity. Urban Studies 45 (9): 1973–1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. (1991) The making of democratic streets. In: A.V. Moudon (ed.) Public Streets for Public Use. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (1987) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2001) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde, M. (2011) Visual evaluation of urban streetscapes: How do public preferences reconcile with those held by experts? Urban Design International 16 (3): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman, R. and Jaszewski, A. (1984) Fundamentals of Urban Design. Washington DC: APA Planners Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. and Appleyard, D. (1987) Toward an urban design manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House Digital, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kum, T.L. and Ujang, N. (2012) The application of mental mapping technique in identifying the legible elements within historical district of Kuala Lumpur city centre. ALAM CIPTA Journal 5 (1): 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, M.R. (2009) Supporting intergenerational interaction: Affordance of urban public space. PhD Thesis, Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University.

  • Lo, S. M., Yiu, C. Y. and Lo, A. (2003) An analysis of attributes affecting urban open space design and their environmental implications. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 14 (5): 604–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1981) A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackett, R.L., Achuthan, K. and Titheridge, H. (2008) AMELIA: Making streets more accessible for people with mobility difficulties. Urban Design International 13 (2): 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A., Cars, G. and Allen, J. (1998) Social Exclusion in European Cities: Processes, Experiences, and Responses. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, C.C. and Francis, C. (eds.) (1998) People Places: Design Guideline for Urban Open Spaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, V. (2007) Lively streets: Determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior. Journal of planning education and research 27 (2): 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J.L. (1998) The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (2008) Defining, measuring, and evaluating path walkability, and testing its impacts on transit users’ mode choice and walking distance to the station. PhD Thesis, University of California.

  • Portella, A.A. (2007) Evaluating commercial signs in historic streetscapes: The effects of the control of advertising and signage on user’s sense of environmental quality. PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University.

  • Pushkarev, B. and Zupan, J. (1975) Urban Space for Pedestrians. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1982) The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehan, R.M. (2013) Sustainable streetscape as an effective tool in sustainable urban design. Housing and Building National Research Center Journal 9 (2): 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, H.M. (1992) Pedestrian Malls, Streetscapes, and Urban Spaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (1991) Visual Research Methods in Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, D. and Huettenmoser, M. (2008) Liveable streets and social inclusion. Urban Design International 13 (2): 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaftoe, H. (2008) Convivial urban spaces: Creating effective public places. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/malaya/docPrint.action?.

  • Shamsuddin, S. and Ujang, N. (2008) Making places: The role of attachment in creating the sense of place for traditional streets in Malaysia. Habitat International 32 (3): 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1989) Postmodern Geographies: Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomalin, C. (1998) Urban spaces in town centres: a route to success. Built-Environment 24 (1): 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, F. and Caves, R. (2012) Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of People and Communities. london: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. (1988) City: Rediscovering the Center. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO World Weather Forecast. (2012) Weather information for Kuala Lumpur, http://www.worldweather.org/020/c00082.htm, accessed 20 March 2012.

  • Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research Design and Methods. London: Sage publication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohadeseh Mahmoudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmoudi, M., Ahmad, F. Determinants of livable streets in Malaysia: A study of physical attributes of two streets in Kuala Lumpur. Urban Des Int 20, 158–174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.3

Keywords

Navigation