Skip to main content
Log in

Meaningful perception of place: The most effective dimensions and factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The basis of the present study is to evaluate the process of meaningful perception of place, and to analyze the effectiveness of each factor influencing this process. It will also investigate the effects of various perceptional dimensions (including cognitive, affective, interpretative and evaluative dimensions) on the manner of perceiving different levels of place meaning. Arg Street in Mashhad city was selected as the study area and both the qualitative and quantitative methods were adopted. Techniques of semi-structured interview, and coding and hermeneutic methods were used to analyze the relation among different levels of place meaning and the effective factors and dimensions of environmental perception. Findings demonstrate that certain perceptional dimensions may have more effect on perception of particular levels of place meaning. The results indicate that ‘cognitive dimension’ is the most influential dimension in perception of the primitive level of place meaning, while ‘affective’, ‘interpretative’ and ‘evaluative’ dimensions play the most significant role in perception of the extreme levels of place meaning. Moreover, this research suggests a need for further studies exploring practical methods in our contemporary urban design projects, which can involve the perception of people with the most effective dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleyard, D. (1976) Planning a Pluralistic City. The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1992) Essais Critiques, Vol. 3: L‘ obvie et L‘obtus. Paris: Seuil.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. and Brabyn, L. (2012) The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification. Applied Geography 35 (1–2): 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. (1977) A Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A.S., Kruger, L.E. and Daniels, S.E. (2003) Place as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources 16 (2): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge, C. and Gibney, J. (2010) Connecting place, policy and leadership. Policy Studies 31 (4): 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. (2008) Changing places: The cost of actualizing the imagined. Multi: The RIT Journal of Plurality and Diversity in Design 1 (2): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. (1999) Framing Places: Mediating Power in Build Form. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. (2009) A test of character: Regulating place-identity in inner-city Melbourne. Urban Studies 46 (12): 2595–2615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., Woodcock, I. and Wood, S. (2005) What is urban character? The case of Camberwell. In: Second State of Australian Cities Conference. Brisbane: Griffith University.

  • Eco, U. (1968) Function and sign: Semiotics of architecture. In: M. Gottdiener and A. Lagopoulos (eds.) The City and the Sign :An Introduction to Urban Semiotics. New York: Columbia University press.

  • Fe’ lonneau, M.L. (2004) Love and loathing of the city: Urbanophilia and urbanophobia, topological identity and perceived incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 (1): 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (2000) Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20 (3): 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1950) The Perception of the Visual World. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T.F. (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (1997) Personal Space, Environmental Psychology Principles and Practice. The University of California: Allyn and Bocon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, K. and Watson, A. (2007) Understanding place meanings on the bitterroot national forest, Montana. Society and Natural Resources 20 (8): 705–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, P. (2001) Meaning of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2006) Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. In: P. Cloke, T. Marsden and P.H. Mooney (eds.) Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage, pp. 44–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993) Building, dwelling, thinking. In: D. Ferrell Krell (ed.) Basic Writings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W.H. (1978) Environmental perception and urban experience. Environment and Behavior 10 (2): 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B.S. and Stedman, R.C. (2001) Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (3): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P. and Pinch, S. (2000) Urban Social Geography: An Introduction. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka, M. (2005) Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighbourhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (4): 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka, M. (2010) What makes neighbourhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, L.C. (2003) Relationships to non-residential places: Towards a reconceptualization of attachment to place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, L.C. (2005) For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (1): 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1991) A global sense of place. Marixm Today 24–29.

  • Massey, D. (1994) Space, Place and Gender. Minnesota: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler 86 (1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1998) Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by C. Smith. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. (2010) Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1): 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C.W. (1971) Writings on the General Theory of Signs. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G., Ratiu, E. and Fleury-Bahi, G. (2002) Appropriation and interpersonal relationships: From dwelling to city through the neighborhood. Environment and Behavior 34 (1): 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg Schulz, C. (1975) Meaning in Western Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg Schulz, C. (1988) Architecture: Meaning and Place. Michigan: Rizzoli International Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, G., Chipuer, H. and Bramston, P. (2003) Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (3): 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1977) Human Aspect of Urban Form: Towards a Man – Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. Great Britain: A. Wheaton & Co. Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1990) The Meaning of the Build Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1976) Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamai, S. and Ilatov, Z. (2004) Measuring sense of place: Methodological aspects. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96 (5): 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sixsmith, J. (1986) The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology 6 (4): 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, R.C. (2003) Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources 16 (8): 671–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, D., Pol, E. and Badenas, D. (2002) Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior 34 (1): 26–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalali, P. Meaningful perception of place: The most effective dimensions and factors. Urban Des Int 20, 222–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.10

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.10

Keywords

Navigation