Skip to main content
Log in

Street network types and road safety: A study of 24 California cities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the role of the street network in road safety outcomes. Data on more than 130 000 crashes occurring over 9 years in 24 medium-sized California cities was input into a geographic information system (GIS) and evaluated against principal measures of street network density and connectivity at the Census Block Group level. Few studies have taken this more comprehensive approach of looking at the complete street network when it comes to safety, partly because until now this kind of holistic assessment would have been very difficult without recent advances in research tools such as GIS. The results of this study suggest that street network characteristics do in fact play a role in road safety outcomes. Although the underlying factors contributing to this role are not yet known, our analysis showed safety outcomes to be associated with street network density. More specifically, our results indicate that the highest risk of fatal or severe crashes occurs with very low street network density and safety outcomes improve as the intersection density increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. (2005) Residential street pattern design, https://www03.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/b2c/catalog/product.do?next=cross#, accessed 25 October 2005.

  • Duane, T. (1996) Human Settlement, 1850–2040. Davis: University of California. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Vol. II, pp. 235–360.

  • Ewing, R. (1996) Best Development Practices: Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time. Washington DC: APA Planners Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filian, R. and Higelin, J. (1996) Traffic engineering in a GIS environment: Highlighting progress of the county of riverside geographic information system based accident records system, http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc95/to050/p029.html, accessed 15 July 2008.

  • Graham, D. and Glaister, S. (2003) Spatial variation in road pedestrian casualties: The role of urban scale, density and land-use mix. Urban Studies 40 (8): 1591–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Paterson, R. and Butler, K. (2003) Planning for Street Connectivity: Getting from Here to There. American Planning Association. Planning Advisory Service Report 515.

  • Janke, M. (1991) Accidents, mileage, and the exaggeration of risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention 23 (3): 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, W.A. and Preusser, D.F. (1999) Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian Injuries among Selected Racial/Ethnic Groups. DOT HS Report no. 809 021. Washington DC: US Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

  • Lerner-Lam, E., Celniker, S., Halbert, G., Chellman, C. and Ryan, S. (1992) Neo-traditional design and its implications for traffic engineering. ITE Journal 62 (1): 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, T. (2005) Roadway connectivity: Creating more connected roadway and pathway networks, http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm116.htm, accessed 25 October.

  • Litman, T. (2008) Evaluating safety and health impacts. TDM Encyclopedia, http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm58.htm#_Toc65190624.

  • Marshall, S. (2005) Streets & Patterns. New York: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noland, R. and Quddus, M. (2004) A spatially disaggregate analysis of road casualties in England. Accident Analysis and Prevention 36 (6): 973–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2002) Environmental Protection Indicators for California (EPIC). Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency & California Resources Agency.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT). (2006) Speed Management. ITRD Report no. E130442. Paris: Joint Transport Research Centre.

  • Sarusua, W., Ogle, J. and Geoghegan, K. (2008) Location, location, location: Using GPS to identify crash location – South Caroline experience. TRB 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD.

  • Southworth, M. and Ben-Joseph, E. (1997) Street and the Shaping of Towns and Cities. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. and Ben-Joseph, E. (2004) Reconsidering the cul-de-sac. Access 24: 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuster, J. and Coffman, Z. (1998) Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Speed and Speed Management. FHWA Report no. RD-98-154. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration.

  • Taylor, J. (2001) Transportation and community design: The effects of land use and street pattern on travel behavior, http://www.jtc.sala.ubc.ca/bulletins/TB_issue_11_Transportation_edit.pdf, accessed 25 October 2005.

  • Tunnard, C. (1963) Man-Made America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesley E Marshall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, W., Garrick, N. Street network types and road safety: A study of 24 California cities. Urban Des Int 15, 133–147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.31

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.31

Keywords

Navigation