Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between the quality of active frontages and public perceptions of public spaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active frontages are often advocated in best practice guidance and by local planning authorities. However, little research has been carried out to establish what benefits, if any, active frontages offer. Previous research in this area has been limited to examining observed behaviour rather than analysing public perceptions. This article aims to improve the understanding of the relationship between the quality of an active frontage and public perceptions of the public space the frontage addresses. The research was carried out through a combination of a critical literature review and a questionnaire survey that engaged 152 participants. The participants’ perceptions of a range of public spaces in relation to a number of frontages were investigated using comparison and correlation. The results suggest that the quality of an active frontage can significantly affect people’s perceptions of a public space in terms of its safety, comfort, sociability and liveliness. Good-quality active frontages can contribute to creating successful public spaces, which can help deliver far-reaching benefits for towns and cities. The findings contribute useful evidence to enhance our understanding of the role of active frontages in urban design and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, S. (1977) A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kodmany, K. (2001) Visualization tools and methods for participatory planning and design. Journal of Urban Technology 8 (2): 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K., Grossardt, T. and Pride-Wells, M. (2007) Community design of light rail transit-oriented development using casewise visual evaluation (CAVE). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 41: 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S. and Smith, G. (1985) Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J., Findlay, C. and Forsyth, L. (2011) An Investigation into Women’s Perceptions of Fear and the Design of the Urban Environment, http://www.openspace.eca.ac.uk/conference/proceedings/PDF/Forsth.pdf, accessed 24 January 2011.

  • Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). (2011) Public space benefits, http://www.cabe.org.uk/sustainable-places/public-space/benefits, accessed 10 March 2011.

  • CABE and DETR (Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions). (2001) The Value of Urban Design: A Research Project Commissioned by CABE and DETR to Examine the Value Added by Good Urban Design. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.

  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003) Public Places, Urban Spaces. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. and Stone, A. (1992) Public Space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLG (Department for Communities and Local Government), DfT (Department for Transport) and Welsh Assembly. (2007) Manual for Streets. London: Thomas Telford.

  • DETR. (2000) By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System: Towards Better Practice. Norwich, UK: HMSO.

  • Department of the Environment (DoE). (1994) Vital and Viable Town Centres: Meeting the Challenge. Norwich, UK: HMSO.

  • Gehl, J. (1994) Places for People. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne City Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2006) Life between Buildings: Using Public Space, 6th edn. Skive, Denmark: The Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J., Kaefer, L.J. and Reigstad, S. (2006) Close encounters with buildings. Urban Design International 11: 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, B., Charlton, J. and Horne, M. (2011) Public squares in European city centres. Urban Design International 16 (3): 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, B. (2000) Developing a Questionnaire. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde, M. (2011) Visual evaluation of urban streetscapes: How do public preferences reconcile with those held by experts? Urban Design International 16 (3): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groat, L. (1988) Contextual compatibility in architecture: An issue of personal taste? In: J.L. Nasar (ed.) Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 228–257.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C., Clark, A., Katz, J. and Peace, S. (2007) Social Interactions in Urban Public Places. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF). (2011) Public Spaces, http://www.jrf.org.uk/work/workarea/public-spaces, accessed 30 March 2011.

  • Llewelyn Davies Yeang and Homes and Communities Agency (HCA). (2013) Urban Design Compendium 1, 3rd edn. London: HCA.

  • Miles, M. (1997) Art Space and the City: Public Art and Urban Futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelessen, A. (1994) Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles, and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1973) Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODPM. (2005) Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development. Norwich, UK: HMSO.

  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). (2004) Safer Places: The Planning System and Crime Prevention. Norwich, UK: HMSO.

  • Plymouth City Council (PCC). (2007) Local Development Framework: Core Strategy 2006–2021. Plymouth, UK: Plymouth City Council.

  • Porta, S. and Renne, J.L. (2005) Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International 10 (1): 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PPS. (2011b) What is a great civic space? http://www.pps.org/articles/benefits_public_spaces/, accessed 25 February 2011.

  • Project for Public Spaces (PPS). (2011a) What makes a successful place? http://www.pps.org/articles/grplacefeat/, accessed 25 February 2011.

  • Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, L. and Chapman, D. (1996) Environment and space. In: D. Chapman (ed.) Creating Neighbourhoods and Places in the Built Environment. London: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, T., Hassler, J., Madanipour, A., Jackson, S. and Roe, M. (2007) Public Space Vitality: In the North East Region. Newcastle, UK: One North East, Culture Northeast and Global Urban Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transport for London (TfL). (2005) Improving Walkability: Good Practice Guidance on Improving Pedestrian Conditions as Part of Development Opportunities. London: Transport for London.

  • Urban Task Force. (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance: Final Report of the Urban Task Force Chaired by Lord Rogers of Riverside. Norwich, UK: HMSO.

  • URBED. (2009) Nottingham City Centre Urban Design Guide. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham City Council.

  • Whyte, W.H. (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington DC: Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Heffernan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heffernan, E., Heffernan, T. & Pan, W. The relationship between the quality of active frontages and public perceptions of public spaces. Urban Des Int 19, 92–102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.16

Keywords

Navigation